
by Ming Xie
Image of three puzzle piece trying to fit together.
As federal policies shift unpredictably, the consequences are particularly acute at the intersection of gender, race, and immigration. Women of color, especially immigrants or those who are undocumented, face compounded vulnerabilities that necessitate targeted responses from local and state governments committed to gender equity.
The Impact of Policy Reversals on Marginalized Women and Immigrant Communities
Recent federal changes, such as the rollback of protections for immigrants and reproductive rights, have significantly affected these communities. For instance, efforts to end Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) have disrupted the lives of thousands of young immigrant women, many of whom manage their families’ healthcare needs. As they navigate the fear surrounding their immigration status, they also face barriers to accessing reproductive healthcare—an often overlooked aspect of gender equity.
In states like Texas, cuts to funding for reproductive health services disproportionately affect women of color, compounded further by federal restrictions on abortion access. These challenges entrench systemic inequalities and limit healthcare options for marginalized communities. Additionally, the reinstatement of the “public charge” rule has deterred many immigrant families from seeking crucial public benefits, exacerbating existing health disparities.
Federal efforts targeting the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have also reduced healthcare access for low-income women, particularly those reliant on Medicaid. Coupled with changes to asylum seeker protocols and the recent decline in refugee admissions, many women of color find themselves in precarious situations without necessary support. These obstacles are often further complicated by heightened immigration enforcement that creates an environment of fear, discouraging individuals from accessing essential services.
Local Responses: Adapting to Federal Changes
In response to these negative impacts, various state and local governments have enacted policies to promote healthcare access for marginalized communities. For example, New York City and Chicago have implemented initiatives ensuring that reproductive health services are available to all residents, regardless of immigration status. Similarly, San Francisco’s sanctuary policy protects undocumented immigrants while guaranteeing their access to reproductive healthcare through community clinic funding. The Reproductive Health Equity Program in Oregon exemplifies how state initiatives can effectively address intersectional vulnerabilities by eliminating out-of-pocket costs for essential reproductive services, ensuring that all women can access necessary care.
Community organizations also continue to advocate for the rights of immigrant women facing racial and gender discrimination. Following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, groups like the International Rescue Committee (IRC) and World Relief have launched initiatives to assist Afghan families resettling in the U.S. with legal aid, job training, and mental health services. In light of rising anti-Asian hate incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations like Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC) have intensified efforts to combat discrimination and provide resources to immigrant women, particularly through legislative advocacy aimed at improving hate crime laws and empowering affected communities.
Additionally, efforts to support immigrant workers during labor strikes highlight the intersection of immigration status, race, and gender. The National Domestic Workers Alliance (NDWA) is at the forefront of advocating for domestic workers, pushing for better labor protections and resources to support fair treatment and wages. These initiatives underscore the need for intersectional approaches to address the challenges faced by immigrant women, emphasizing the importance of equity in policy discussions.
Federal policy shifts pose significant challenges to gender equity, particularly for women of color and immigrants. Local and state responses that embrace an intersectional approach are vital for mitigating these negative effects. By prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable, subnational actors can help reshape the narrative around gender equity and promote more inclusive policies. Amplifying the voices of those directly affected remains crucial as we continue to engage with these pressing issues.

About the author:
Ming Xie is a researcher specializing in disaster resilience, refugee studies, nonprofit management, and public health policy. Her work examines the impact of state and federal immigration policies on refugee resettlement, as well as the health and climate change-related risks faced by vulnerable communities. Using mixed-methods research, Ming explores community-based participatory approaches to disaster preparedness and resilience. She also investigates nonprofit practices related to activism and social movements, focusing on how organizations engage with and mobilize communities. Additionally, her research includes understanding the behavioral intentions of rural residents regarding wildfire preparedness and the influence of communication strategies on refugees’ health risk perceptions during climate-related disasters.
